Monday, 6 October 2014

SERMON 46 - SUNDAY 5 OCTOBER 2014


Sermon at St. Mary’s Parish Church, Alderbury, Wiltshire Wiltshire – Sunday 5th October 2014

Exodus 20:1-4; 7-9; 12-20; Phillipians 3:4b-14; Matthew 21:33-46

May I speak in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit and may these words be a blessing to all who hear them.  Amen

There is an immense richness about each and every one of our readings this morning which I think can all be linked together with the one word “faith” – or in the words of Paul “justification by faith” – the belief that salvation and forgiveness can be obtained by a true belief in Jesus Christ as our Saviour and not simply a strict adherence to the law.

In the first of our readings we are reminded of the Torah, the book of law handed down to the Hebrews by Moses and upon which the Jewish faith is so heavily founded – laws or a code of conduct given by God directly to his people for the proper governance and guidance of his chosen people – laws which were frequently broken but which, by a strict adherence the Jews thought would ensure that Yahweh or Jehovah, the unspeakable God looked down favourably upon them.

 Let us just recall those Ten Commandments and here is a very easy way to remember them in the order they appear in the Exodus:

1.         The is only one God – no others

2.         Don’t two time God by falsely worshipping other idols

3.         There are three names for God – Father, Son and Holy Spirit – don’t use them wrongly.

4.         Remember the Sabbath – the letter “4” looks a bit like a deckchair to rest in

5.         Honour your father and mother – How often do children take their parents for granted and think of them as simply a cash machine – No. 5 “lend us a fiver Dad”,

6.         Do not murder – the letter “6” resembles a hangman’s noose

7.         Do not commit adultery – think of the “seven year itch” we are sometime told about

8.         Do not steal – the letter eight looks like a pair of handcuffs if turned on its side

9.         Do not bear false witness – No 9 is not 10 – it is not the last of the commandments

10.       Do not covet etc. Think of thin “1” and fat “0”. Have and have not.

 
That was just a bit of fun but I bet you will remember the order of the Commandments after this.  

The Old Testament is full of examples of where those commandments were broken – time and time again and we only have to look at David as a really good (or should I say bad) example of somebody who broke nearly every one of them – especially murder, coveting, adultery and theft.  We read how, during the course of the history connected with the Jewish people an attempt to keep to the law still brought about trials and tribulations and eventually, God sent down his only son, Jesus, to redeem his people – and us today.

Our gospel reading is a clear allegory for this.  The vineyard in the story represented Israel and the vines its people.  The tenants those who had been put in charge of its spiritual welfare – the holy ones – the priests, levites, Pharisees and sadducees. The fence with the watch tower around the vineyard represents the law we have just discussed from the times of the Exodus.  The Torah which was meant to keep the vineyard secure.  The allegorical picture painted by Jesus in this parable would have been clear and certainly it would have, and did, upset the chief priests and Pharisees who wanted to arrest Jesus.  The owner of the vineyard is God and, the previous slaves represent the prophets such as Elijah and Elisha.  Finally sending his son, Jesus, who is killed by those same tenants – representations of those in authority. In this parable Jesus is not only pouring scorn on the way in which the tenants are behaving towards the vineyard and its owner, but also predicting his own crucifixion.  He is also predicting the demise of those who reject it and pointing out that the same stone which is dug up and cast aside will be the cornerstone of a new Christian church.

I love the reading from Paul.  It has spoken to me personally on many occasions and it reminds me of an early occurrence in my professional career as a lawyer.

Shortly after completing my degree course in law at Liverpool I joined a large commercial food manufacturing company in my home town of Grimsby in its legal department. I was full of myself and probably was quite obnoxious – a bit of a know it all straight from law school! I was, nevertheless, a humble legal clerk still to take my final professional examinations to qualify as a solicitor and was given the task of collecting small debts for my employer.  One case which I had was for a debt of about £5.95 from memory.  I spent half a day reading the file, reviewing the law of contract and its ingredients  – offer, acceptance, invitation to treat, consideration etc. etc. and in law decided my client company had a cast iron case.  I then set about issuing proceedings, drafting the summons and a lengthy particulars of claim – complete with law of contract legal authorities – cases learned in law school – and finally went to see my boss to request a cheque for the issue fee – say £4.50. It was then that he pointed out to me the commercial nonsense of what I had just done and by the time we worked out the number of hours I had spent on the case, the issue fee and finally – something I hadn’t even thought about – the likelihood of getting the defaulter to pay anything back at all from his history, I realised that I had, in fact wasted an enormous amount of my employer’s time and money.  I protested that the case was legally watertight and that the law was clear.  My boss agreed with me and then quietly advised me to bin the case.  The answer was simply that the company would no longer supply this defaulter with food products – fresh fish if I recall correctly.

The moral of this parable of my own – let’s call it the parable of the chip shop owner – was that whilst the law is there to be observed and followed there are times when that alone will not provide the answer and can, in fact, work against those who would seek to uphold it if we don’t consider God’s separate hand in everything.  We often try and take matters into our own hand or think that the law or more earthly solutions will give us the answer.  Paul in our second reading makes it clear that having followed the law religiously for many years he sees that as “rubbish” – “rubbish” when compared to following the example and teachings of Christ. The law will not, of its own bring us that which we need.

Recently I have been studying and reflecting on the whole concept of forgiveness and grace.  My spiritual adviser, a very wise individual indeed reminded me that there are three distinct types of forgiveness – personal forgiveness which is us, as individuals, forgiving those who have wronged us – whether they have asked for forgiveness or not – something which Archbishop Desmond Tutu calls “a gift which we give to ourselves” not to the perpetrator of those who have wronged us; secondly legal forgiveness – the righting of the wrong by legal means – the issue of proceedings against those who have wronged us but not to our own detriment and finally the greatest of all of these – “divine forgiveness” – which is totally out of our hands.

Both retribution and forgiveness of a divine nature we must always leave to God but personal forgiveness is for us and us alone.

Paul was himself, as we know, someone who zealously persecuted Christians in his early youthful “law clerk” days.  Like me, as the young lawyer, he saw the law as being the most important thing in obtaining righteousness.  It’s the right thing to do.  But how often do we ask ourselves – is it the thing which God thinks it is right for us to do?  The tenants in the vineyard wanted to protect their tenure and secure it by foul means – even resorting to murder. But in the end, as the parable points out they ended doing what God had planned and bringing about their own destruction.

How often do we – you and me – seek to put things “right” without bringing God, through Jesus, into the equation?  Howe often do we stand on the solemnity and sometimes inflexibility of the law without looking at things from a deeper and wider perspective? How often do we, like the tenants, build a fortress which, whilst seeking to protect what we have, also shuts out the Holy Spirit which should be allowed to freely enter us – especially in times of trial – when we need him most.

In a moment we shall sing the hymn – “all I once held dear” which echoes what Paul was writing about in his letter to the church in Phillippi.  As we sing it let us each and every one think how we can be more open to receiving the Holy Spirit and setting aside some of our earthly bound habits, values and prejudices.

Amen

 

MFB/46

No comments:

Post a Comment