Monday, 26 January 2015

SERMON 53 - SUNDAY 25 JANUARY 2015


Sermon at RC Chapel, Whaddon, Salisbury – Evening Prayer - Sunday 25 January 2015

Psalm 33; Titus 2: 1-15

May I speak in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, Amen

I love Psalm 33 – it is so full of optimism and praise for God and reminds us that the most fastidious of plans which we might have can be so easily thwarted and frustrate us - but those which God has, whilst often confounding us, are the ones that prevail. 

How often do we plan things right down to the tiniest detail and yet something which we haven’t planned or which we didn’t spot comes up and completely throws all our hard planning to one side. 

I have to confess to be being rather an avid fan of the programme Air Crash Investigation which examines in close detail what caused some of the deadliest and notorious of airliner crashes.  I am not sure what that says about my personality! It never ceases to amaze me, and worry me too, how the deadliest of disasters are often caused by the simplest of errors and also that 95% of all air crashes have an element of human error involved – like the pilot who switched off the wrong engine at Kegworth, or the engineer who fitted the plane’s windscreen with screws too short for the purpose or the air traffic controller who simply forget that there was an aircraft on the runway when giving permission for another one to land.  We often say, “I’m only human” as an excuse for things we’ve done wrong, mistakes we’ve made,  but we would be well advised to think in those terms too whenever we pray to the one who, whilst coming down in human form, is also divine and who hears us when we pray in faith.

There are two phrases in tonight’s Psalm which we said together which speak strongly to me: “Sing him a new song” and “The Lord brings the counsel of the nations to naught, he frustrates the designs of the peoples; but the counsel of the Lord shall endure forever, and the designs of his heart from generation to generation.”

The psalmist is saying that we need to repent – to turn away from our old ways – to turn to new ones – the ones he wants for us – to sing him a new song.  And in the later quote he reminds us (and here he is talking principally about the peoples of Israel) that unless we are working to the same agenda as him, all our plans and energy will come to nought and we must always keep his desires and grace in mind. As God’s servants we are here to serve him in today’s world. By the way we worship and act we are witnesses to his love and desires.

Paul takes up this theme in his letter to Titus. Titus was a young church leader in Crete, the largest of the Greek islands – and in the passage which was read to us tonight he is addressing the church leadership through this letter to Titus – the essence of which is that the leadership must teach sound Christian Doctrine to the Christian community.  The beginning of the letter, Chapter 1, which was not read this evening, reminds those Christians in Crete that they must remain pure in heart and demonstrate that purity in the way they speak and behave and this is evening more so when addressed in the second chapter to the leaders of the church. Titus is specifically called upon to teach what is “consistent with sound doctrine…to be temperate, serious, prudent and sound in faith, in love and in endurance”.

From what we know of historic records, at this time Cretans were far from these ideals and Paul was anxious that where people stated to be Christians, and in particular were visibly seen as leaders of this new religious “order”, they should give no cause for criticism that they did not adhere to what he calls doctrine.

When we read the list of virtues which Paul asks Titus and his groups to display none of them should come as anything of a surprise to us.  Indeed as Christians in the 21st Century, we should be displaying all of these virtues in a world that sees so much disruption and evil and where it is often hard to be able to show our Christian grace without appearing as a doormat or being ridiculed.

I am not sure I quite agree with Titus’s views on slavery in verse 9 and 10 – these verses actually being removed from the Lectionary - but I have deliberately kept them in because at the time Paul was writing this letter, slavery was just as much a part of everyday life as owning a mobile phone today or car.  In effect, Paul is telling the slaves to act in a way expected of them – as he too is asking the church leaders also to act in a way expected of them. As Christians, to act in a way expected of you.

The role of us, as active disciples of Christ in 2015, is also to act as expected.  It is no good, for example, for me to stand here and denounce Sunday trading and then, in the same breath, go into Tesco straight afterwards or more unlikely still, denounce the evils of drink and then go over the road and have a pint or two in the Three Crowns Inn.  That is something which you would be quite right not to expect me to do if I were to preach to you the doctrine of abstinence.  We are all expected to live pious lives – that doesn’t mean, of course, boring - lives – Jesus’s own life was very far from boring – but lives which honour the teachings and deeds of Jesus Christ.  

Over the years different churches have taught different doctrines resulting in many ecumenical councils to work out difference between churches and within churches – especially the eradication of heresies and the forming of a common doctrinal view on who Jesus actually was – Divine, Human or Both?  And also as to when he became Divine or was he always Divine?  “Ecumenical” comes from the word “economy” – which comes from the two Greek words “oikos” meaning “household” and “nomos” meaning “law” – in other words “the laws of the house”.  I am currently undertaking a specific module on Christian Doctrine and ever since Jesus’s time theologians have argued at great length over doctrine – resulting in the Great Schism of 1054 and later the forming of the Protestant Faith in 1519. Much blood has been spilled over differences in Christian Doctrine – a virtual civil war between Christians. So it is good to go back to read Paul’s letters when he was setting up and ministering to the early Christian churches around the Mediterranean.  And here, in Titus, as in his two books to Timothy, his other great young progeny, he simply goes back to the basics of Jesus’s teachings as a basis for Christian Doctrine.

As I pursue my studies as a minister of this church I often think of how theologians have often complicated our thinking.  Yes, it is true that the bible, all 66 different books (39 Old and 27 New Testament) need careful analysis and interpretation - often to understand their historical background and context – hermeneutics as theologians call it,  but the message is often very clear and simple and this letter to Titus is no exception.

The final two paragraphs could so easily have been written this weekend – rather than nearly 2,000 years ago and I think it worth repeating them again:

11For the grace of God has appeared, bringing salvation to all,* 12training us to renounce impiety and worldly passions, and in the present age to live lives that are self-controlled, upright, and godly, 13while we wait for the blessed hope and the manifestation of the glory of our great God and Saviour,* Jesus Christ. 14He it is who gave himself for us that he might redeem us from all iniquity and purify for himself a people of his own who are zealous for good deeds.

15Declare these things; exhort and reprove with all authority.* Let no one look down on you.”

 

If we follow that advice I think we can do little wrong in living up to what is expected of us by he who created us and in doing this we can live in peace with ourselves and God taking whatever life may throw at us:

 

Let us pray:-

 

A prayer: by St. Therese of Lisieux

Our God,

We ask for ourselves and for those dearest to us

The grace to fulfil perfectly your holy will

And to accept for love of you

The joys and sorrows of this passing life

So that one day we may be reunited in heaven for all eternity.

Amen

 

MFB/Sermon/53

Monday, 19 January 2015

SERMON 52 - SUNDAY 18 JANUARY 2015


Sermon at St. Lawrence’s Parish Church, Stratford-sub-Castle, Salisbury - Evensong - Sunday 18 January 2015

Matthew 8:5-13; Luke 7:1-10

May I speak in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, Amen

When I was just a little boy, we had a small 9-inch TV, A Bush if I remember correctly, which would take about five minutes to “warm up” – so you had to use your Radio Times to know in advance when to switch the set on – and once the cathode tube was glowing you had the excitement of watching just one channel – BBC TV. That channel only became BBC 1 when BBC 2 arrived.  We didn’t even have ITV so Coronation Street, Peyton Place, Danger Man, No Hiding Place, the Flintstones and other goodies could only ever be seen when I went around to a friend’s or cousin’s. Life was simple, your knowledge of news events came from either the radio, one TV channel or newspaper.

Today that is all very different.  We are bombarded with news and information all the time.  This one small hand held computer – my mobile – is far more powerful than all the then sophisticated equipment which landed Man on the Moon. Even as I stand here preaching to you, messages will be pinging their way to me through emails and social media; and as events unfolded last weekend in France I was intrigued by the differing emphases being placed on the event by the different news agencies – all with their own political or social or cultural agenda – CNN News, Sky News, RT News, BBC News, Al Jazeera News, even Chinese News.  All of these and many many more are available so that we can get the news story which best suits us.  The same event can be portrayed in so many different ways and even to some, what may appear to be a terrible act of terrorism may be, to others, an heroic act of religious fervour.  Now I am not for one moment condoning the acts in Paris last week but simply pointing out that such events set in their historic background may appear different many years later.  For example are Nelson Mandela, Martin McGuinness, Michael Collins, Jomo Kenyatta, Oliver Cromwell or William Wallace terrorists or freedom fighters?  We must leave it to our own judgement of history to decide – and it will very much depend upon what books of history we read for each will have its own agenda – hero or villain.

This leads me to tonight’s gospel reading from Matthew – the healing of the Centurion’s servant – but before I even go into analysing and commenting upon it – it is worth remembering, like the news stories of last week, Matthew’s account is not the only one – Luke also has this story in his gospel which is written in a different style entirely. You will find his version at Luke 7:1-10 and it makes an interesting comparison when read after Matthew’s – and I think we can assume that this is the same event and that there were not two different centurions with servants being asked to be healed by Jesus especially as both events occurred in the same city of Capernaum.

In tonight’s version we have the Centurion himself seeking out Jesus – we are told that the Centurion came to him and said “Lord my servant is lying at home paralysed in terrible distress” – to which Jesus immediately says “I will come and cure him” prompting the Centurion to reply strangely, “Lord I am not worthy to have you under my roof but only speak the word and my servant will be healed”. The Centurion then goes on to say that he is a man of great authority and can command those under him to come and go as he pleases and this pronouncement of his great authority and command amazes Jesus, who immediately does as the Centurion asks and heals the servant remotely. This is one of only two occasions when Jesus acts to heal a non-Jew or does so at the request of a non-Jew (actually we don’t know for certain that the servant was not a Jew and the Centurion himself might have been Jewish because very often officers in the Temple or Royal Herodian Guard often used titles similar to those used by their Roman lords as a sign of solidarity with their conquerors). The other occasion when Jesus healed a non-Jew was the Canaanite woman. So what was the reluctance of the Centurion to have Jesus come to his home? In fact, the translation of what precisely Jesus said in response to the original request is in some doubt and it might not have been that Jesus said “I will come and cure him” but rather Shall I come and cure him”? - a question rather than a statement.  We cannot be certain but in Matthew’s version the Centurion himself makes it clear that Jesus is not to bother himself coming because he believes he can cure the servant remotely.

Luke’s version is significantly different. In it, Jesus is still in Capernaum but it is not the Centurion who requests Jesus to heal the servant but a group of Jewish elders whom he sends out to find Jesus. These elders impress upon Jesus the fact that this Centurion is a good friend to the Jewish people – he built them a synagogue apparently - and so Jesus goes with them to the Centurion’s house; but when close approaching the property some friends of the Centurion – not the Centurion himself – come out and tell Jesus not to trouble himself coming into the house – and a similar conversation takes place as in Matthew’s gospel about commanding people to come and go – but this is with the friends and not the Centurion – indeed, in the whole narrative by Luke the Centurion not once appears himself – and I think this is significant. It was when those friends returned to the house that they found the servant restored to good health. So in both accounts we do have the common denominators of a reluctance for Jesus to come to the house and an absolute faith in Jesus’s ability to heal the servant.

So what can we glean from this?  Well I think the first thing to note is that as there are two versions of this story and each of them has some distinct differences. We can take neither of them as being a definitive expose of the actual true events. Just as all those different TV channels gave differing accounts of the Charlie massacre in Paris, so these two gospel accounts vary.  However, the Charlie Massacre did take place, there are common aspects to all the versions reported and we must take our own view of what we are being told by looking at all versions.

Similarly, the bible is a living book.  When reading it we must be open to what it says to each one of us.  To me, the common story of the Centurion is that here we have someone, somebody, who is not a Pharisee or Sadducee, who has heard of Christ’s healing ministry and fully believes. In his sending out of the twelve elsewhere in Matthew (10:6) Jesus tells them not to bother with the Gentiles – that his and their mission is to minister to the “Lost Sheep of Israel” and as we saw earlier, Jesus’s healing ministry seems fairly restricted to Jews only. However, here, because of the massive faith which the Centurion has – that Jesus can heal remotely – he is demonstrating that Jesus has come for everybody and, as we know, St. Paul later was to deliberately spread the gospel to many Gentile cultures.  It is interesting that there are two other important events in the New Testament involving Centurions – the Centurion at the foot of the Cross who announces that Jesus is indeed the Son of God when all around were jeering and Cornelius who was baptised by Peter in Acts (10) where Luke devotes a whole detailed chapter to his and his family’s conversion and Peter’s revelation that it is okay to eat non-Kosher food.

So let’s not get too obsessed with getting every little detail in our heads as we read our scripture. Accept and reflect upon the lessons or narratives they seek to convey. The gospels were written at least 50 years after the events they seek to record.  Today with our mobile phones, our “TwitFaces” or whatever, we crave instant accurate information.  Sometimes it is good to sit down and reflect on the message. Here the message I think is simple – Jesus Christ’s healing hand is available to all who genuinely believe that he and the Holy Spirit are with us here and now – even if, as in Luke’s version, the Centurion who believed never actually saw him.

This reminds me very much of the words of Jesus recorded in John 20:28 to Doubting Thomas “Have you believed because you have seen me? Blessed are those who have not seen and yet come to believe”.

May we all be so blessed.

Amen

 

MFB/Sermon/52

Monday, 12 January 2015

SERMON 51 - SUNDAY 11 JANUARY 2015


Sermon at St. John’s Parish Church, West Grimstead, Salisbury - Morning Worship - Sunday 11 January 2015

Genesis 1:1-5; Psalm 29; Acts 19:1-7;  Mark 1:4-11

May I speak in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, Amen

When I started the preparation for this sermon – on the topic of the Baptism of Christ, I did what I suspect a lot of preachers do – I went back through my old sermons to see if I had preached on it before and, if so, whether there was anything I could use again or indeed if I could preach the whole thing again.  Well, I discovered that I had indeed preached on it before, exactly one year ago, and the congregation I had preached it to was none other than yourselves.  Knowing how well attentive you all are here, at St. John’s, to the sermons preached I was confident that I could not get away with giving you the same sermon twice – you would have readily remembered what I had said last time – yes?

Today’s first reading takes us back to page one of the bible – those so well known words of the Creation story.  “In the beginning…God.” I’ll come back to that in a moment.

Did any of you attend any of the “Darkness into Light” services in the Cathedral last month? If you did, like me, you will have witnessed a wonderful spectacle as the cathedral, cloaked in darkness, gradually became filled with light from hundreds of candles – from a single candle at the west end right up to the Trinity Chapel in the east – before the Prisoners of Conscience Window. Candle upon candle was lit, down the nave and side aisles and into the transepts and chapels – filling the nooks and crannies of that wonderful medieval building with a wonderful warm glow. This was figuratively to announce the coming into the world of God incarnate – the Light of the World. In the same way that our Genesis reading this morning starts “In the beginning…” so does John’s gospel start - the same echoing of that first book of the bible.  In the beginning was the Word” (Jesus) just as in the beginning was God – emphasising that the two are one and the same and then a little later on John announces that John the Baptist was not the “Light” but gave testimony to the “Light” – the light being of course Jesus.

It is therefore no coincidence that John chooses to commence his gospel in this way.  For many theologians, the coming of Christ into the world is seen as a Second Creation. The world which God had created had gone so horribly wrong, following the Fall and the Flood, that it needed God to come down to Earth as a man and put things right - by his three years of ministry and his ultimate atonement for our sins, past, present and future, on the Cross. 

John, like Mark, then moves immediately into the narrative of Jesus’s baptism.  Scholars readily acknowledge that the first gospel to be written was that of Mark’s and as we embark upon Year B in the Church of England’s lectionary, so Mark’s gospel will unfold in all the gospel readings we have throughout the year.  Mark’s gospel advances at an immense pace – it seems that Mark is in such a hurry to get everything recorded and written down yet unlike Matthew and Luke, there is no Christmas story – no birth narrative, no shepherds, no wise men or lowing cattle or even donkeys.  Mark plunges straight in with the reading we’ve just heard. So for both Mark and John this is a significant point in Jesus’s history on Earth – marking as it does the beginning of his ministry – the moment when God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit unite in one place on Earth – the Holy Spirit descending like a dove and God announcing that he is well pleased – God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit all together on Earth. 

In Genesis, we see the three together again at the First Creation – “The earth was without form and void”; “the Spirit of the God moved over the waters” and “God divided the darkness and the light”.

Let us compare that to the baptism story – The Earth was a fallen place, Man had lost his connections with God by making religious observance rather than genuine worship of greater importance. But here, right at the beginning of this New Creation we see God in the form of a man and how does he begin his ministry – with water and the Holy Spirit – demonstrating a rebirth.  Symbolically, in full immersion baptisms, there is a figurative death of old ways – “repentance” to use the word of John the Baptist as the person goes under the water and a figurative re-birth (being “born again” as the Charismatics say) as he or she is raised up out of the water.

Did Jesus (God incarnate) need to be baptised?  Well yes – to show the way to others and demonstrate the re-birth, the re-creation so necessary for our salvation.

I want to say a little bit more about light and also look at our second reading from Acts. 

In my village, Winterslow, there has been debate going on for many years now about whether or not the main roads should be street-lit.  The general consensus has been that they should not, as the darkness which descends upon the village at night, particularly at this time of year, affords such wonderful views of God’s wider creation – the wonders of the heavens – the night sky – and on good nights we can see wonderful views of the Milky Way, the Great Galaxy in Andromeda, the Great Nebula on Orion and so on.  These are light years away from us - millions of light years away in fact.  Through my telescope, for example, the furthest I have seen is 40 million light years away – a galaxy in the constellation of Leo, the Lion. I am literally looking at something as it appeared 40 million years ago. It might not even be there now!  My telescope is a time machine! As an amateur astronomer I am sometimes asked whether the massive distances and study of the cosmos, black holes, big bangs and so on test my faith as to whether there really is a God.  My answer is emphatic -  these things make me even more sure that there is a God and it also makes me feel quite important that despite the vastness of God’s Creation – the Universe and maybe beyond even that – he sent his only Son, Jesus Christ, down to planet Earth, a seeming small insignificant planet orbiting a small unremarkable star in the out reaches of one of billions of ordinary galaxies becomes he so loved our world and by implication – us!

Scientists will tell you that darkness is simply the absence of light.  You can demonstrate this quite easily when you see a shadow.  It is cast when the light source is blotted out by an object. The only way in which that shadow can be removed is either to remove the object or to provide another light source.  In the Genesis Creation story we are told that God created the light and separated it from the darkness.  In fact we now know that day and night are caused by the rotation of the Earth on its own axis which means that, at one particular point on the Equator, for 12 hours the land is pointing towards the Sun and for 12 hours the Sun has dipped below the horizon because the land is pointing away from the Sun – but the Sun is always there and if you were to travel in a space craft beyond the orbit of the Earth like the Apollo astronauts, you would see the Sun all the time (as does happen at the poles).

In the same way God created light at the Second Creation.  The Light of God was always there but humankind had placed objects (over reliance on religious observance for example) and evil to blot out that original light.  We were cut off from God and in shadow. Christ became the second light to remove those dark places and the great news is that with the Holy Spirit he is still here amongst us today shining his light into the darkest places if we will only acknowledge and believe in him.

This leads us nicely into our Second Reading from Acts.  Here we read of Paul, that new convert to Christianity, meeting up with some new believers who, following the example of Christ, had allowed themselves to be baptised like John – with water.  Paul reminds them that such baptism was an acknowledgement of repentance – that they had agreed to turn away from their sins and follow the true faith taught by Jesus Christ, John being the testimony to the light as written by John.  However, before his ascension, Jesus had promised his followers that in due course they would receive the baptism of the Holy Spirit, the same Spirit which had descended upon him at his baptism of repentance and had also hovered over the fact of the water at the First Creation. In other words, necessary for the completion of the conversion to being true Christians – followers of Christ with full gifts and fruits of the Spirit. When the new believers told Paul they didn’t know what he was talking about when he spoke of the baptism of the Holy Spirit, Paul laid his hands upon them and baptised them in the name of Jesus Christ and they received the Holy Spirit.

In our Church, generally when we baptise somebody we no longer immerse them fully. However, symbolically we use water as did John and the priest will make the sign of the Cross and baptise in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. At a later date, when the candidate has had an opportunity to fully comprehend and make his own mind up, he may confirm those commitments for himself. He is blessed with the Holy Spirit from the moment he accepts Jesus Christ as his Saviour.

Baptism does not make us perfect.  As Christians we are not perfect and all of us have flaws.  I remember the story being told once by an evangelistic preacher at Spring Harvest that we are all like cracked pots – not I hasten to say “crack pots” – although some might disagree! – cracked pots within which the light of Christ shines – for we should all have Christ’s light within us.  It is often only through our cracks, our humility our vulnerability our fragility that the light can shine out to others. The way we accept adversity.

James, in the first chapter of his book talks about us only becoming “mature and complete” – the Hebrew word he uses means “perfect” – through the perseverance brought about through trials in our lives. And so, to be truly Christ-like, true and perfect followers of Christ we need to repent (turn away from our dark ways); accept Jesus as our Lord and Saviour (receiving the Holy Spirit) and show his light with joy through the trials and tribulations of this life. A mirror of Christ’s own life in fact – repentance before John the Baptist, receiving and having the gifts of the Holy Spirit and his final suffering on the Cross leading to his perfect resurrection.

What an incredible story and what an incredible act the follow. Today, let us make a pledge to lead a life where our light can shine out and dispel the gloom and darkness,  which often surrounds us and all those whom we should love – our neighbour. Even through our cracks.

Let us pray a prayer inspired by Psalm 119

Almighty God

We are often beset by trials and difficulties

We often feel surrounded by darkness or gloom

 

We often feel lost and hopeless

We often forget that you are always there with us

We often try and go it alone

We often forget to talk things through with you

We often let the pressures of this hectic life get us down

 

Help us to remember that you sent your Son, Jesus Christ

and the Holy Spirit to be with us in your Second Creation

That your word will continue to be a lamp to our feet

And a light to our path

And that we may glorify you in the light which you have put within us

Amen

 

MFB/Sermon/51